[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PF and passing traffic from RFC 1918 addresses in on external interface
- To: "Henning Brauer" <lists-openbsd_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de>, <misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org>
- Subject: Re: PF and passing traffic from RFC 1918 addresses in on external interface
- From: "Mark Hopkins" <mhopkins_(_at_)_headwaystaffing_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:18:33 -0400
- Thread-index: AcNVHBrDqOIXW9yCRLGzhj5d6b93fwAAanZA
- Thread-topic: PF and passing traffic from RFC 1918 addresses in on external interface
That's what I thought. Why is it then, that incoming 192.168. traffic isn't getting routed to the internal lan when PF is enabled. That's what doesn't make sense to me.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Henning Brauer [mailto:lists-openbsd_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 11:22 AM
To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: PF and passing traffic from RFC 1918 addresses in on
external interface
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:05:17AM -0400, Mark Hopkins wrote:
> First, my question:
> Does pf drop traffic incoming on the external interface from RFC 1918 address by default, even if the ruleset says to pass in all, pass out all?
no.
--
http://2suck.net/hhwl.html - http://www.bsws.de/
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
Visit your host, monkey.org