[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: softupdates recommendation

To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: softupdates recommendation
From: "Sancho2k.net Lists" <lists_(_at_)_sancho2k_(_dot_)_net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 18:21:41 -0600

Marco Peereboom wrote:

I use softupdates just about everywhere. Sure there are corner cases where one can loose some data however I (usually) prefer the performace boost over the potential to loose data. Keywords here are UPS, stability and easily recreated/restored data.


One last thing then; from the FAQ:

To use Soft Updates, your kernel must have
option FFS_SOFTUPDATES
compiled in, this is already in place on GENERIC.

I can't find any such reference to FFS_SOFTUPDATES in GENERIC; is it just there, but not listed as an option?

DS

Follow-Ups:
- Re: softupdates recommendation
  - From: Michael Erdely

References:
- softupdates recommendation
  - From: Sancho2k.net Lists

Prev by Date: Re: BIND 9 questions
Next by Date: strange problem installing via http
Previous by thread: Re: softupdates recommendation
Next by thread: Re: softupdates recommendation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org