[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NTP considered basic
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: NTP considered basic
- From: Matthew Weigel <Matthew_Weigel_(_at_)_t-pyxidis_(_dot_)_fac_(_dot_)_cs_(_dot_)_cmu_(_dot_)_edu>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 17:05:40 -0400
> The `without fee' is the problem I think.
No, I think that that pretty clearly indicates that you don't owe the
UDelaware/David Mills a fee for doing so.
I *suspect* the problem is that it does not give the right to
distributed modified versions (which is a different right from
modifying, and from distributing verbatim copies).
This is what came up with ipf, as I recall. It's also the problem with
the pine license that keeps it from being free.
That said, I'm surprised they're not up to amending it.
Research Systems Programmer