[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tcpdump misbehaving today
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: tcpdump misbehaving today
- From: "N. Thomas" <nthomas_(_at_)_cise_(_dot_)_ufl_(_dot_)_edu>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:12:19 -0500
* Hugo Villeneuve <harpagon_(_at_)_jwales_(_dot_)_EINTR_(_dot_)_net> [2003-01-14 13:35:09 -0500]:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:45:54PM -0500, N. Thomas wrote:
> > root 5899 0.0 0.0 328 192 ?? Ss 11Dec02 3:16.24 pflogd
> > root 3485 0.0 0.0 328 196 ?? Ss 11Dec02 5:08.92 pflogd
> > root 9307 0.0 0.0 328 208 ?? Ss 17Dec02 3:32.58 pflogd
> > root 40 0.0 0.0 328 204 ?? Ss 25Dec02 2:24.13 pflogd
> > root 1541 0.0 0.0 328 208 ?? Ss 28Dec02 2:17.96 pflogd
> > root 3475 0.0 0.0 328 200 ?? Ss Wed02PM 0:41.03 pflogd
> > root 30123 0.0 0.0 328 204 ?? Ss Thu06PM 0:39.74 pflogd
>
> Why are you running so many pflogd? They each take a bpf device and
> that's why you have none available for normal use.
Yeah, I had mucked around with pf last month, and apparently never
cleaned house. Much thanks for the info.
thomas
--
N. Thomas
nthomas_(_at_)_cise_(_dot_)_ufl_(_dot_)_edu
Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo
Visit your host, monkey.org