[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NetBSD SMP
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: NetBSD SMP
- From: Chuck Yerkes <chuck+obsd_(_at_)_2003_(_dot_)_snew_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:44:05 -0500
- Mail-followup-to: Chuck Yerkes <chuck+obsd_(_at_)_2003_(_dot_)_snew_(_dot_)_com>, misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Reply-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Quoting Will Ellis-Adams (admin_(_at_)_reifier_(_dot_)_org):
> >What are those complains? I haven't heard them.
>
> From: "J. Joseph Max Katz" <jkatz_(_at_)_cpio_(_dot_)_net>
> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 19:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
> cc: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
> "As for borrowing FreeBSD SMP code, that's probably not a wise
> idea. I know a lot of FreeBSD advocates who were blasted because
> it really isn't that scalable. Their kernel isn't re-enterent
> as it needs to be. "
And in 1998, we had FreeBSD 2.2.4.
And during FBSD 3.x, they found that their locking was far
too great (large spaces locked causing poor scaling). And
for 2 years, they've been working on much smaller locking in
5.0 (now rc2).
Visit your host, monkey.org