[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: altq+pf bandwidth wrong?
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: altq+pf bandwidth wrong?
- From: Olivier Cherrier <oc_(_at_)_karedas_(_dot_)_cediti_(_dot_)_be>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:05:09 +0100
- Mail-followup-to: Olivier Cherrier <oc_(_at_)_karedas_(_dot_)_cediti_(_dot_)_be>, misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 05:17:00PM +0100, lists-openbsd_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de wrote:
> well you know you cannot really limit bandwidth incoming. you can limit
> bandwidth outgoing. on the typical forwarding box the traffic is outgoing on
> one interface...
Is the 'conditioner - CDNR' command from ALTQ removed since the
PF and ALTQ merge?
from 3.2 altq.conf manpage:
The conditioner command specifies a diffserv traffic conditioner. A traffic
conditioner is not a queueing discipline but a component to meter, mark or
drop incoming packets according to some rules.
As opposed to a queueing discipline, a traffic conditioner handles incoming
packets at an input interface. If no queueing discipline (e.g., CBQ) is used
for the interface, a null interface command should be used to specify an input
oc - oc_(_at_)_karedas_(_dot_)_cediti_(_dot_)_be
Visit your host, monkey.org