[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ultrasparc 3
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: Ultrasparc 3
- From: Chris Hedemark <chris_(_at_)_yonderway_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 02:19:27 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 02:08 AM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
I think Chuck got to the point. AFAIK, OpenBSD is developed mainly for
acting as firewalls, routers, or short-range secure servers, which do
make a large CPU load.
Hmmm my desktop machine is an Athlon running OpenBSD. I suspect many
people here would say the same thing (that OpenBSD is their desktop).
It's more painful to set up as a desktop than some of the popular
flavors of Linux, but once it is working it works fine.
It is good to supports more architectures and more processors, but even
the need of the sparc64 arch could be questionable.
I strongly disagree here. Ultra 5 and Ultra 10 machines are cheap now.
My primary file server at home is a sparc64 box running OpenBSD 3.1
and it's been delightfully boring to have (boring in that it never does
anything exciting or unexpected to distract me from more important
Don't get me wrong, I
run OpenBSD as a gateway on my SS10, but didn't even thought about
on my U10 or E250, Solaris seemed to be a better solution ;)
Try it on the U10. I think you'll like it. It rips.
For the E250, try out Aurora Linux. It's kind of the anti-BSD (based
off of Red Hat 7.3) but it works well on the Enterprise servers that
have been tested so far, and obviously will make use of multiple
I am not a fan of making holy wars about OSes, rather selecting the
OS for box's purpose.
Almost. Pick the OS to fit the task at hand. Then acquire the box to
suit the OS you have selected, and other working parameters of the
intended application. Few successful IT engineers would buy a machine
and then sit around waiting for an application to throw at it. That
said, it makes sense that anyone who is running an application spec'd
to run on OpenBSD might avoid some of the newer Sun boxen in part
because of the company's reluctance to share docs, and more importantly
because the lack of docs jeopardizes the long term viability of the
system at hand.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----