[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
one reply from sun about ultrasparc3 support
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: one reply from sun about ultrasparc3 support
- From: m_(_at_)_rl206_(_dot_)_org
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 23:15:55 -0600
------- Forwarded Message
I'm sorry you don't yet believe that we are striving to be a traditional
company that works well with the Open Source community. Most of our
efforts to date have been in the software arena, and I think some of
what you ran into was the trailing edge of Open Source awareness (in the
I'm not at all surprised to hear that you run BSD on SPARC. Many of my
pals in Apache tell me the same. I'm happy to help you make that
configuration run better. I only wish you guys had found me sooner, before
you got so angry with Sun. I ask you to please look at our many contributions
in the software arena and compare them to our competitors...then tell me whether
we've made any ground in your opinion of us?
Look at SunSource.net if you don't believe me.
In any case, I think we're going to make quick progress now on the SPARC
3 information needed by OpenBSD.
Thanks for writing.
Sun Open Source Programs Office
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 06:35 PM, martink_(_at_)_redteam_(_dot_)_ca wrote:
> You guys call yourselves open source? More often Sun is coming across
> as a wolf in sheep's clothing.
> Lots of people run sparcs without solaris, and we are not about to
> about to move to solaris either.
> Witholding hardware documentation will not result in increased profits
> for Sun's solaris division; rather it will result in losses of sparc
------- End of Forwarded Message