[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 Mobile Adapter unsupported?

To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 Mobile Adapter unsupported?
From: Duncan Martin <openbsd_(_at_)_codebunny_(_dot_)_org>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 19:26:54 +0000

Hi,

> which card is a better one? Do you have any experience which card is
> recommended?
I have a MBLA1600, got it working on 3.1 (you think it's hassle on OpenBSD?  Try Win95...) haven't tried 3.2

Yes, the performance is sucky, and it caused my laptop to freeze if I had it my 2nd PCMCIA slot (seemed OK in the 1st slot).  Now using a 3com 3c574-tx, which is also a 16-bit card if that matters to you, and seems fine.

Duncan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 Mobile Adapter unsupported?
  - From: Duncan Martin

References:
- Re: Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 Mobile Adapter unsupported?
  - From: Volker Kindermann
- Re: Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 Mobile Adapter unsupported?
  - From: jolan
- Re: Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 Mobile Adapter unsupported?
  - From: Volker Kindermann

Prev by Date: Re: standalone imap servers
Next by Date: Re: standalone imap servers
Previous by thread: Re: Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 Mobile Adapter unsupported?
Next by thread: Re: Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 Mobile Adapter unsupported?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org