Re: "Puffy" toy! was RE: 3.2 poster...

[Mike Shaw <mshaw_(_at_)_wwisp_(_dot_)_com>]

At 02:14 PM 10/16/2002 -0700, Jason Downs wrote:
> In message <3DADD35C_(_dot_)_5000905_(_at_)_polarcap_(_dot_)_org>,
>         Tony Sarendal writes:
> >How about an OpenBSD condom ?
> >       "No penetration for nearly six years !"
>
> Isn't that exactly what a condom is meant to safely allow?

It's chrooting the process.

And why is it that even us married guys have such a hard time getting root 
access?  I think OpenBSD has no unique claim to "secure by default".

-Mike