[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Puffy" toy! was RE: 3.2 poster...
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: "Puffy" toy! was RE: 3.2 poster...
- From: Mike Shaw <mshaw_(_at_)_wwisp_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:28:28 -0500
At 02:14 PM 10/16/2002 -0700, Jason Downs wrote:
In message <3DADD35C_(_dot_)_5000905_(_at_)_polarcap_(_dot_)_org>,
Tony Sarendal writes:
>How about an OpenBSD condom ?
> "No penetration for nearly six years !"
Isn't that exactly what a condom is meant to safely allow?
It's chrooting the process.
And why is it that even us married guys have such a hard time getting root
access? I think OpenBSD has no unique claim to "secure by default".