[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BiNat and ftp-proxy for webhosting on OBSD 3.1 -release
- To: <misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org>
- Subject: Re: BiNat and ftp-proxy for webhosting on OBSD 3.1 -release
- From: "Shaun Sturby" <shaun_(_at_)_optrics_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:46:29 -0600
(replying to my own post.)
In further testing it seems to be a problem, not with pf and binat but, with
running an ftp server on a non standard port.
It seems to work fine for a ftp server running on the default port 21 with
the client in active mode. Passive mode will not work nor will any mode that
encrypts the command channel.
Problem solved, mostly, by moving ftp to port 21.
From: owner-misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org [mailto:owner-misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org]On Behalf Of
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 2:24 PM
Subject: BiNat and ftp-proxy for webhosting on OBSD 3.1 -release
Here is an interesting challenge to chew on.
Due to the ISP we use for web hosting declaring bankruptcy we had to move
multiple servers last weekend to a new ISP.
Q1. Does any one have experience with this scenario that they would like to
Multiple ftp servers behind a BINAT firewall.
I know 3.2 is about to be released and it has a lot of enhancements to pf
Q2. Does this scenario work better in OBSD 3.2?
Thanks in advance for any pointers.
Shaun Sturby, MCSE
Optrics Inc. and FundSoft - Canadian Ipswitch Premier Partners
Email: shaun_(_at_)_optrics_(_dot_)_com Website: <http://www.optrics.com>
Snail: Suite 100 4911 - 114 St. Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6H 3L5
Tel:(780) 466-6016 Toll Free: 1-877-386-3763 Fax:(780) 432-5630
Solutions for a Connected World: <http://www.optrics.com/linecard.htm>
IMail Server has scanned this e-mail for viruses using Declude Virus from Optrics.com