[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bytebench
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: bytebench
- From: William Ahern <william_(_at_)_25thandClement_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 20:14:33 -0700
I ran bytebench on an Aspen Systems Durango II 633mhz Alpha/512MB RAM I just
purchased from ebay, and on a Celeron 600mhz/128MB RAM. the Celeron seems
to have proved 2X's the performance of the Alpha! How is this? How
can I determine the cache size of the Alpha? Is it on-die? I can't figure
out what the problem is. Is the benchmark just worthless for a comparison?
Included are the results. TIA
=== PIII (Coppermine) 600mhz ===
Arithmetic Test (type = double) 2541.7 176021.2 69.3
Dhrystone 2 without register variables 22366.3 1388801.0 62.1
Execl Throughput Test 16.5 1747.0 105.9
File Copy (30 seconds) 179.0 21587.0 120.6
Pipe-based Context Switching Test 1318.5 105661.9 80.1
Shell scripts (8 concurrent) 4.0 168.7 42.2
=========
SUM of 6 items 480.1
AVERAGE 80.0
=== Alpha 21164A-2 633mhz ===
Arithmetic Test (type = double) 2541.7 179184.9 70.5
Dhrystone 2 without register variables 22366.3 711053.4 31.8
Execl Throughput Test 16.5 1299.7 78.8
File Copy (30 seconds) 179.0 13401.0 74.9
Pipe-based Context Switching Test 1318.5 0.0 0.0
Shell scripts (8 concurrent) 4.0 65.7 16.4
=========
SUM of 6 items 272.3
AVERAGE 45.4
Visit your host, monkey.org