Re: pf rdr problem with port ranges in -current (and ahc success report)

[Philipp Buehler <OpenBSD_(_at_)_fips_(_dot_)_de>]

On 02/08/2002, Thorsten Glaser <tygs_(_at_)_netcologne_(_dot_)_de> wrote Cc misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org:
> I remember them saying in IRC that the code has changed and everybody
> is now waiting for pb@'s shiny new manpage which reflects these changes
> and even more.

BNF is up to date in -current tree

His syntax is valid (right now), but the parser has a bug there.

Stop to speculate on things.

Most probably the syntax will change now, consistency of port
ranges should be there, and ':' is a pain anyway (think of inet6 addresses)

ciao
-- 
Philipp Buehler, aka fips | sysfive.com GmbH | BOfH | NUCH | <double-p> 

#1: Break the clue barrier!
#2: Already had buzzword confuseritis ?