[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ftp-proxy for real world ?
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: ftp-proxy for real world ?
- From: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:20:25 +0200
- Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 07:38:24AM -0400, ed_(_at_)_overminder_(_dot_)_com wrote:
> Would they permit traffic like h323 across NAT or will be application level filters ?
> I was fooling around with OpenH323 recently and following a few old
> discussions on misc_(_at_)__(_dot_)_ It was general agreement that H323 is bloated,
> and would not work through IPF. So therefore apps such as Netmeeting
> would generally not work through an OpenBSD firewall (PS - I know
> about the MS article and the ports problem).
> However, a little birdie told me that linux/netfilter guyz now have a
> masq under linux. So, I'd like to have a feature request (if possible)
> for OpenH323 support under pf.
> Any comments, flames etc.?
No fucking way
Do you have any idea how fucking insane the h.323 protocol is? Anyone
who runs a h.323 should get shoved out a window, beaten, flayed, spanked,
shot, disembowled, hung, and forced to listen to hummpa music. If you
want to firewall h.323, go commit yourself to an asylum with straight
jackets and with padded walls -- at least you'll be in common company
with the other linux wacko's.
(Mike Frantzen on tech at openbsd.org 20 Aug 2001)
(it's actually humppa, mike ;-) )