[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pf vs ipf
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: pf vs ipf
- From: Reza Muhammad <g0m3d_(_at_)_yahoo_(_dot_)_ca>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:55:21 -0400 (EDT)
How about OpenPF instead?
Personally, I like the name of pf rather than ipf. BUt
then OpenPF came to my mind.. It would be cool started
from OpenBSD, OpenSSH, then OpenPF ..
anyway.. just a thought :)
--- Ash <ashcrow_(_at_)_phreaker_(_dot_)_net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 22:39, Woodchuck wrote:
> > Ah. I have it: "OpenIPF".
> > Dave
> I personally don't really see any reason to change
> pf to ipf, but
> OpenIPF isn't half bad. It points out the license
> objection, diffrence
> in actual software, and sounds nice too.
Post your ad for free now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Visit your host, monkey.org