[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pf vs ipf
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: pf vs ipf
- From: Alfred Breull <puma_(_at_)_hannover_(_dot_)_sgh-net_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 08:06:23 +0100
Theo de Raadt <deraadt_(_at_)_cvs_(_dot_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org> wrote:
>I have been thinking about renaming pf to ipf.
No. Too late. Additinally to the points mentioned by others, this
comes to mind:
 it's image loss, specially so close after the recent vulnera-
 re-naming will produce ideas, like pf has holes and Theo was
required to use ipf code, secretely.
 in the long run, Darren has won in people's minds because
[3.1] even _you_ are trusting rather in ipf than in pf;
[3.2] whatever has been said against ipf in the last year will hit
back against you.
Besides this, I feel it unfair to all, Daniel (and all others) and
What are the pro's?
Visit your host, monkey.org