[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pf vs ipf
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: pf vs ipf
- From: Ash <ashcrow_(_at_)_phreaker_(_dot_)_net>
- Date: 22 Jul 2002 00:38:24 -0500
On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 22:39, Woodchuck wrote:
> Ah. I have it: "OpenIPF".
I personally don't really see any reason to change pf to ipf, but
OpenIPF isn't half bad. It points out the license objection, diffrence
in actual software, and sounds nice too.