[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pf vs ipf
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: pf vs ipf
- From: J Shoemaker <shoemaker_(_at_)_softhome_(_dot_)_net>
- Date: 21 Jul 2002 14:00:41 -0600
Theo de Raadt <deraadt_(_at_)_cvs_(_dot_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org> writes:
> I have been thinking about renaming pf to ipf.
>
> Comments?
Proverbs 26
4 Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like
unto him.
5 Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own
conceit.
It's true enough; when someone is too reasonable and the first doesn't
work, the second usually will... :) Sounds like a wonderful idea, and
a great way to shunt all the griping to the ipf lists - should be
wonderful fun explaining over and over that _this_ ipf isn't _my_
ipf...
Visit your host, monkey.org