[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OBSD 3.1 NAT configuration question
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: OBSD 3.1 NAT configuration question
- From: Philipp Buehler <OpenBSD_(_at_)_fips_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 23:25:08 +0200
- Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Reply-to: Philipp Buehler <OpenBSD_(_at_)_fips_(_dot_)_de>
On 08/07/2002, Raymond C. Rodgers <obsd_(_at_)_bbnk_(_dot_)_dhs_(_dot_)_org> wrote To misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org:
> So what I'm wondering is if my internal NAT config line ("nat on dc0 from
> 192.168.0.0/24 to any -> dc0") is essentially competing with the rdr lines
> ("rdr on dc0 proto udp from any to dc0 port 7500:7800 -> 192.168.0.45 port
> 7500:*" and "rdr on dc0 proto udp from any to dc0 port 22000 ->
> 192.168.0.45 port 22000"). Perhaps packets are never getting as far as the
> rdr lines?
Yes, NAT evaluation uses first-match-wins.
You can fine tune this w/ closer specification about who is
talking to who and 'no nat'. See nat.conf.5
Philipp Buehler, aka fips | sysfive.com GmbH | BOfH | NUCH | <double-p>
#1: Break the clue barrier!
#2: Already had buzzword confuseritis ?