[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: good IPF firewall ruleset
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: good IPF firewall ruleset
- From: "Irwin R. Naumann" <irwin_(_at_)_thinkage_(_dot_)_ca>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:11:37 -0400 (EDT)
> From owner-misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org Thu Sep 20 10:44:36 2001
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:40:59 +0200
> From: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de>
> To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
> Subject: Re: good IPF firewall ruleset
> Mail-Followup-To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type> : > text/plain> ; > charset=iso-8859-1>
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Sender: owner-misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
> X-Loop: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
> Content-Length: 670
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:29:12PM +0200, Arvid Grøtting wrote:
> > > block out quick from any to 220.127.116.11/4
> > I know that 18.104.22.168/23 was assigned by RIPE this week.
> I remember a message by RIPE saying they start delegating 22.214.171.124/4 (or
> /8?). So many many many new allocations in europe will be within 80/4.
> > Blocking
> > /huge/ netblocks simply because at some point in time they /were/n't
> > assigned seems like a bad idea to me.
> Big ACK.
> * Henning Brauer, hostmaster_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de, http://www.bsws.de *
> * BS Web Services, Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
> Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
> (Dennis Ritchie)
The definitive allocation of IPV4 address space resides at:
Its most recent update is June 19, 2001.
080/8 & 081/8 are assigned to RIPE NCC - to be doled out to European ISP's
as some previous postings indicated.