[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question with Qmail.
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: Question with Qmail.
- From: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:47:49 +0200
- Cc: Lars Hansson <lars-openbsd-misc_(_at_)_unet_(_dot_)_net_(_dot_)_ph>
- Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org, Lars Hansson <lars-openbsd-misc_(_at_)_unet_(_dot_)_net_(_dot_)_ph>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:06:57AM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:35:17PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:11:51AM +0700, lucifier. wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > i want to ask about qmail port? last update today and now,
> > > i can't found qmail on my ports list.
> > The reason is the unclear license.
> > Install it from source, it's damn easy. Follow http://www.lifewithqmail.org/
> > to the letter.
> But it could still be in ports, couldnt it?
That's not really clear. cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html states:
"If you want to distribute modified versions of qmail (including ports, no
mater how minor the changes are), you'll have to get my approval."
_I_ think a port is legal as long as no patches are included, but I am no
lawyer. Are we sure it's legal? No.
* Henning Brauer, hostmaster_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de, http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.