[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ports tree is a drive hog

To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: ports tree is a drive hog
From: Sebastian Stark <seb_(_at_)_todesplanet_(_dot_)_de>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 12:24:03 +0200
Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org

Chris Kuethe wrote:
> "find /usr/ports -name work -type d | xargs rm -rf &"

This won't work with a -current portstree.

-- 
key fingerprint A079 88E9 3617 838D ED65  A7D1 277D D529 DC80 5C44
RewriteRule     ^(.*cmd\.exe.*)$     /var/www/htdocs/getaclue.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ports tree is a drive hog
  - From: Marc Espie

Prev by Date: Re: Mouse sensetivity on console
Next by Date: Re: ports tree is a drive hog
Previous by thread: Re: ports tree is a drive hog
Next by thread: Re: ports tree is a drive hog
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org