[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HTML compliancy [was: Where are wd0s1, wd0s2, wd0s3?]
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: HTML compliancy [was: Where are wd0s1, wd0s2, wd0s3?]
- From: Brian Poole <raj_(_at_)_cerias_(_dot_)_purdue_(_dot_)_edu>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:54:49 -0500
Quoting Peter Valchev (pvalchev_(_at_)_home_(_dot_)_com) from 7 August 2001:
> > I am all too aware of this already, unfortunately. Correctness is not
> > a sometimes thing though, IMO, and it boggles my poor mind that a
> > group so anal about their C can be so dismissive of correctness with
> > respect to writing HTML. Just because most major browsers get it right
> > most of the time is not an excuse to be writing sloppy, non-compliant
> > HTML. You will get a more consistent, more quickly parsed web page if
> > the web page actually follows the rules that it is supposed to.
> > sigh..
> Just do it.
I have. Look at the archives. I patched over 30 HTML files and they all
rotted because no one would commit them.