[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: raidctl
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: raidctl
- From: <alx2001_(_at_)_medimex_(_dot_)_ro>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 19:19:14 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
Why is everybody don't read the whole message ...
If u look below u'll see that I've snip a part of my disklabe and if u
looked to the size ... u'll notice is the same to the both partisions!!!
on both HDDs.
So I tried with the same partisions on diff hdd and it gave me the error
that i've posted below.
It worked with 2 partisions (same size !!!) on the same hdd.
But when I try with diff hdd it didn't work.
THIS IS WHAT I POSTED IN MY QUESTION!!!
READ CAREFULLY BEFORE U POST SOME KIND OF ANS., PLS!!!
alx
>Try making your partitions the same sizes, it tend to help.
>
>jeff
> Hi,
> I have openbsd 2.9 release not current, I'm making cvs for current right
> now. So I have problems in configuring raid 0 on my box.
> My rfconfig looks like this:
>
> START array
> 1 3 0
>
> START disks
> /dev/wd0h
> /dev/wd1i
>
> START layout
> 32 1 1 0
>
> START queue
> fifo 100
>
> And the disklabe say this:
>
> h: 401625 9815715 4.2BSD 1024 8192 16 # (Cyl. 611 -
> 635)
> on wd0.
>
> and
>
> i: 401625 10233405 4.2BSD 1024 8192 16 # (Cyl. 637 -
> 661)
> on the other one wd1.
>
> When I try to raidctl -C rfconfig raid0 (where rfconfig is in path) it
> says something like:
> bash-2.05# raidctl -C rfconfig raid0
> raidctl: ioctl (RAIDFRAME_CONFIGURE) failed: No such file or directory
>
> and the the dmesg says:
> RAIDFRAME: protectedSectors is 64
> raidlookup on device: START layout failed!
> Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 0
> Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 1
> Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 2
> vnode was NULL
> RAIDFRAME: failed rf_ConfigureDisks with 2
> Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 0
> vnode was NULL
> Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 1
> vnode was NULL
> Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 2
>
> I want to mentionate is I configure with raid 0 or raid 5 on the same wd0
> (with 2 or 3 partitions on the same wd0)
> it works with no problems. (newfs si mount etc)
> What it could be the problem ?
> Any ideea? Tks
> Alx
Visit your host, monkey.org