[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: raidctl
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: raidctl
- From: <alx2001_(_at_)_medimex_(_dot_)_ro>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 17:06:51 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
Let's see:
bash-2.05# mount
/dev/wd0a on / type ffs (local, softdep)
And if u looked through the messages u'll see somethin' like a snip from
disklabel.
Another is the problem ...
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Peter Galbavy wrote:
> Dumb question, but so the devices named exist in /dev ?
>
> rgds,
> --
> Peter Galbavy
> Knowtion Ltd.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <alx2001_(_at_)_medimex_(_dot_)_ro>
> To: <misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 3:53 PM
> Subject: raidctl
>
>
> > Hi,
> > I have openbsd 2.9 release not current, I'm making cvs for current
> right
> > now. So I have problems in configuring raid 0 on my box.
> > My rfconfig looks like this:
> >
> > START array
> > 1 3 0
> >
> > START disks
> > /dev/wd0h
> > /dev/wd1i
> >
> > START layout
> > 32 1 1 0
> >
> > START queue
> > fifo 100
> >
> > And the disklabe say this:
> >
> > h: 401625 9815715 4.2BSD 1024 8192 16 # (Cyl. 611 -
> > 635)
> > on wd0.
> >
> > and
> >
> > i: 401625 10233405 4.2BSD 1024 8192 16 # (Cyl. 637 -
> > 661)
> > on the other one wd1.
> >
> > When I try to raidctl -C rfconfig raid0 (where rfconfig is in path) it
> > says something like:
> > bash-2.05# raidctl -C rfconfig raid0
> > raidctl: ioctl (RAIDFRAME_CONFIGURE) failed: No such file or directory
> >
> > and the the dmesg says:
> > RAIDFRAME: protectedSectors is 64
> > raidlookup on device: START layout failed!
> > Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 0
> > Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 1
> > Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 2
> > vnode was NULL
> > RAIDFRAME: failed rf_ConfigureDisks with 2
> > Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 0
> > vnode was NULL
> > Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 1
> > vnode was NULL
> > Closing vnode for row: 0 col: 2
> >
> > I want to mentionate is I configure with raid 0 or raid 5 on the same
> wd0
> > (with 2 or 3 partitions on the same wd0)
> > it works with no problems. (newfs si mount etc)
> > What it could be the problem ?
> > Any ideea? Tks
> > Alx
Visit your host, monkey.org