[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IPNAT performance problem - was poor performance
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: IPNAT performance problem - was poor performance
- From: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 19:24:07 +0200
- Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:11:20PM -0400, Gary MacKay wrote:
> Hmm, watching this thread has me worried. I switched most of my clients
> to OpenBSD because it is said to be the "best thing since sliced bread".
Even given IPNats performance problems its after all still better than
everything else I had a look at. I'd never come to the idea to try the
project I had to drop due to IPNats performance problems with linux.
> Now I see this type of thing and wonder if I made the right choice.
> Granted, this has next to nothing to do with security, which is what
> OpenBSD is best at, but still. I was looking for a total solution.
> Please, no flames, I'm very serious, now that linux has iptables, should
> I switch back? At least until the new 'pf' is available? I need a
> solution that provides both, speed and security. Well, and doesn't cost
> a zillion bucks!
No, until PF is available OpenBSD + IPFilter is the best option available
* Henning Brauer, hostmaster_(_at_)_bsws_(_dot_)_de, http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.