[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: IPNAT performance problem - was poor performance

To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: Re: IPNAT performance problem - was poor performance
From: ruettimac_(_at_)_dplanet_(_dot_)_ch
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 17:11:55 +0200

>On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:18:10AM +0200, ruettimac_(_at_)_dplanet_(_dot_)_ch wrote:
>> It seams that the box running NAT is the bottleneck. But why? 
>
>IPFs NAT performance is unfortunately not that good. I had to drop a project
>due to this, even really fast i386 hardware (athlon 1.1ghz) wasn't able to
>handle the load.

My machine is a PI 233 Mhz, spending between 1-3% on interupting under load.

Is there an other solution around for NAT which works?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: IPNAT performance problem - was poor performance
  - From: Eric LeBlanc
- Re: Re: IPNAT performance problem - was poor performance
  - From: Henning Brauer

Prev by Date: Re: OPENBSD_2_9 (SEMMNI, SEMMNS, SHMMAXPGS): httpd Memory fault(core dumped)
Next by Date: Re: Re: IPNAT performance problem - was poor performance
Previous by thread: Re: IPNAT performance problem - was poor performance
Next by thread: Re: Re: IPNAT performance problem - was poor performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Visit your host, monkey.org