[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: IPNAT performance problem - was poor performance
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: Re: IPNAT performance problem - was poor performance
- From: ruettimac_(_at_)_dplanet_(_dot_)_ch
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 17:11:55 +0200
>On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:18:10AM +0200, ruettimac_(_at_)_dplanet_(_dot_)_ch wrote:
>> It seams that the box running NAT is the bottleneck. But why?
>IPFs NAT performance is unfortunately not that good. I had to drop a project
>due to this, even really fast i386 hardware (athlon 1.1ghz) wasn't able to
>handle the load.
My machine is a PI 233 Mhz, spending between 1-3% on interupting under load.
Is there an other solution around for NAT which works?