[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stripped OpebBSD: tarballs available
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: stripped OpebBSD: tarballs available
- From: Tor Roberts <tor_(_at_)_econsci_(_dot_)_net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:07:02 -0800 (PST)
I could not disagree more. The OBSD installer is so simple, easy to use
and quick. Nothing even comes close. It is by far the best installer of
any OS I know. The Redhat installer is a complete joke.
Also, I think that the ports/packages system is fantastic. Again, it is
easy to use and simple. There is nothing to gain from making anything more
complicated than it has to be. That is why I love OpenBSD, the system is
tight, simple, and secure. Please don't change that.
-Tor
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Chris Hedemark wrote:
> Jan Johansson wrote:
>
> > Why this need to "strip"? OpenBSD is stripped by default.
>
> Wellllllll, yes. And no. The installer is probably my biggest gripe about
> OpenBSD. It gives you a few big packages to choose from and doesn't really
> tell you what is in those packages. Red Hat is doing something very nice
> where you can pick those giant groupings of packages that are all
> interrelated if you want them (still more granular than the oBSD install)
> but if you are a power user you can pick specific RPM's which represent
> specific tools. I'd very much love OpenBSD to go in this direction. And
> include an easier tool for handling disk partitioning. :-)
>
> All in all once it is up and running I love it. But the installer is
> probably the biggest weak spot in the distribution right now. (MHO)
>
> Chris Hedemark - Hillsborough, NC
> http://yonderway.com
>
>
>
Visit your host, monkey.org