[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Silly IPNat Idea (was ipf vs. nmap)
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: Silly IPNat Idea (was ipf vs. nmap)
- From: Andrew Shugg <andrew_(_at_)_neep_(_dot_)_com_(_dot_)_au>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 01:34:58 +0800
- Mail-followup-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Justin Brzozoski said:
> I know IPNat doesn't currently support this, and there's no reason why
> you would really *need* to do this, but it would be fun if you could
> NAT people's traffic back at themselves. i.e. have a dynamic redir
> whose destination is taken from the source address of the packet being
I thought of that too, a couple of months ago. =)
Would implementing such a thing be practical? Can anyone comment?
Andrew Shugg <andrew_(_at_)_neep_(_dot_)_com_(_dot_)_au> http://www.neep.com.au/
"Just remember Basil, there's always someone worse off than yourself."
"Oh, really? I'd like to meet him ... I could do with a good laugh."
[ Sybil and Basil Fawlty, "Fawlty Towers" ]