[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Interesting that this topic came up now, as I've been trying to explain the
difference to some people I work with.  I think I've come up with a reasonable
explaination of the two.

Both strive to keep the software available.  The GPL approach is
in that it specifically tries to prevent certain situations from occuring.
The BSD approach is more anarchistic.  It flat out says that the code is
available and then gets out of the way.

Although I can appreciate the ideas behind the GPL, the BSD way is better;
simple is better.

(we are pretty off track now from misc)

--STeve Andre'

On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 05:00:39AM -0600, Chris wrote:
> At 01:35 AM 2/3/00 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> <snip>
> >
> >You are being manipulated.
> >
> It is all well and good to say this, but I've seen little if any arguments
> as to why the BSD license is preferable to the GPL (or any other free
> software type liscence).