[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default route
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: Default route
- From: Diana Eichert <deichert_(_at_)_wrench_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:29:57 -0700 (MST)
Why don't you just boot with the GENERIC kernel to see if your kernel
changes were the problem.
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> | Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> | > The default route has to lie within a network that is directly connected
> | >
> | > Can you ping it with no default route added ?
> | Yes, I can ping the gateway.
> | I see netstart trying to add the default ... it says "Network is Unreachable."
> | But the network is fine when it's done, just no default route.
> | Maybe I should *confess* that I recompiled the kernel because the defaults
> | for my net card weren't right. In the process, I removed all the other net
> | card support. Could I have nuked something out of the kernel that would
> | cause this behaviour? I kinda understand the relation between the various
> | busses and the devices, so I don't really suspect this, but Murphy Lives.
> It's possible that you messed it up...
> If you see "Network is unreachable" then there may be a typo in /etc/mygate
> because you should only see that if the host is not on a directly connected
> Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
VP Technical Services
Nothing in Particular at the Moment, Inc.