Re: linux most secure

[Louis Bertrand <louis_(_at_)_signalpath_(_dot_)_on_(_dot_)_ca>]

Oh I can't resist jumping in.  I regret selling my Radio Shack Color
Computer 2 that ran OS-9. Now _that_ was a machine, with real
multi-tasking. Networking? Only if you could wiggle the bits on the
parallel port chip fast enough...

Ciao!
 --Louis

Louis Bertrand, Bowmanville, ON, Canada
<louis_(_at_)_signalpath_(_dot_)_on_(_dot_)_ca>


On Fri, 18 Sep 1998, chuck wrote:

> Well, nobody's ever gotten into my Apple 2 or Kaypro
> from the net.  And I can see web pages on it with
> Lynx and a serial port connection to the Sparc - even
> on my TV with the Apple.
> 
> The VIC-20 is a fine machine though.
> 
> Quoting Dana Booth (dana_(_at_)_oz_(_dot_)_net):
> > On 17 Sep, kozmo killah wrote:
> > 
> > > because i know the linux is most secure internet os,
> > > i want to know why i should use other os?
> > > 1) linux
> > > 2) microsoft NT
> > > 3) solaris
> > > 4) netBSD
> > > 5) freeBSD
> > > 6) openBSD
> > > 
> > > 1 being more secure and 6 being no secure,
> > 
> > I think dos+windows 3.1 would be a good choice for you. It's the
> > funniest thing, too, the damn thing will dial when you load up IE.
> > Avoid any other Internet tools, as they may confuse you.
> > 
> > If that seems too complex, I have an old Vic-20 that may be more your
> > speed, complete with a model 1600, 300 baud modem for your online
> > pleasure.
> > 
> > You hooked me, but it was a fun troll anyway!
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > ---------------------------
> > Dana Booth <dana[at]oz.net>
> > Tacoma, Wash., USA
> > ---------------------------
>