[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: man du versus BLOCKSIZE
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: man du versus BLOCKSIZE
- From: "Doctor Who" <drwho_(_at_)_drwho_(_dot_)_xnet_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 08:31:05 -0500
- Delivery-date: Mon May 11 20:44:49 1998
On May 9, 7:07pm, Aaron Jackson wrote:
> There are quite a few, but for starters, I have killed systems from
> making a typo while root ;) Also, su keeps a log of who goes to root, so
> you can catch people who do bonehead things while root. I suppose it
> doesn't really make a difference if you are the only person who uses your
>-- End of excerpt from Aaron Jackson
Of course, it's even *safer* to use the "sudo" command (or some similar
program) to handle root commands in some cases.
On my home machine, I have 2 main login accounts: "drwho" (normal user
account) and "admin" (has full su, sudo, etc access). The "drwho" account
has the "safe" sudo setup, so that account can only run a few commands as
root. The advantage is, if you have slippery fingers (like I often do),
then you can setup sudo to run only *safe* commands from your account, or
things that aren't likely to do serious damage. Not to mention, sudo
only allows you to run a single command with root privs, rather than actually
*becoming* the root user and then forgetting you're su'ed to root and
doing something dumb (been there, done it).
Unix Admin/BOFH | "<clickety-click>..." -- 'nuff said.
Email: drwho @ xnet.com | Member: CAUCE - http://www.cauce.org
http://www.xnet.com/~drwho | PGP public keys available on my web page.