[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: documentation/1993: symlink(7) doesn't withstand extreme pedanticism
- To: bugs_(_at_)_cvs_(_dot_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: documentation/1993: symlink(7) doesn't withstand extreme pedanticism
- From: Phil Pennock <Phil_(_dot_)_Pennock_(_at_)_globnix_(_dot_)_org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 02:20:04 -0600 (MDT)
- Cc:
- Reply-to: Phil Pennock <Phil_(_dot_)_Pennock_(_at_)_globnix_(_dot_)_org>
The following reply was made to PR documentation/1993; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Phil Pennock <Phil_(_dot_)_Pennock_(_at_)_globnix_(_dot_)_org>
To: gnats_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Cc: Subject: Re: documentation/1993: symlink(7) doesn't withstand extreme pedanticism
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:16:35 +0200
On 2001-08-09 at 08:05 +0000, Phil Pennock wrote:
> >Fix:
> (1) Change paragraph to start:
> For example, given "directory" and "slink" not pointing to directory, the
> command [......]
I've been informed that this is not sufficient. It doesn't cover the
case of "slink" pointing to a fs ancestor of "directory". *sigh*
> (2) Buy a black-market gun, shoot boss.
A very big gun.
--
Some mornings it's just not worth gnawing through the straps.
Visit your host, monkey.org