[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: documentation/1533: pipe(2) direction.
- To: bugs_(_at_)_cvs_(_dot_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: documentation/1533: pipe(2) direction.
- From: Tanaka Akira <akr_(_at_)_m17n_(_dot_)_org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:00:02 -0700 (MST)
- Cc:
- Reply-to: Tanaka Akira <akr_(_at_)_m17n_(_dot_)_org>
The following reply was made to PR documentation/1533; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tanaka Akira <akr_(_at_)_m17n_(_dot_)_org>
To: Artur Grabowski <art_(_at_)_stacken_(_dot_)_kth_(_dot_)_se>
Cc: gnats_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
Subject: Re: documentation/1533: pipe(2) direction.
Date: 29 Nov 2000 11:44:52 +0900
In article <lubk89oaza7_(_dot_)_fsf_(_at_)_chicken_(_dot_)_stacken_(_dot_)_kth_(_dot_)_se>,
Artur Grabowski <art_(_at_)_stacken_(_dot_)_kth_(_dot_)_se> writes:
> Original pipe(2) created a unidirectional pipe
Yes.
> and we shouldn't encourage
> incompatibilities with other operating systems just beacuse our pipes are
> better.
I think that a manual should be honest. Note that other Unix which
have a bidirectional pipe such as SVR4 or FreeBSD describes it with
its incompatibility.
--
Tanaka Akira
Visit your host, monkey.org