[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ln and -F
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Chris Humphries wrote:
> yes, i have just been doing some reading on that, and one should still be able
> to use -F for symlinks, correct? so why not enable a logic rule that makes it
> where you have to have -s in conjunction with it, or else it will not work?
You don't need it. -s will link directories without the need of a -F
flag. The -F stands for "I really mean this, yes I do. I'm nuts, but
go ahead anyway."
You do not want your directories hard linked. Ever. If you think you
need to hard link dirs, think it over again. The -F option is for people
who really know that they are doing. Those people don't ask about the
lack of documentation.
If you ever would give them a helping hand,
You can be sure they'll chop off the arm.
Never, ever, never trust a Klingon; you will always regret it.