[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: July 2 22:06 i386 snapshot broken?
> Would I be correct in guessing that you didn't use the snapshot boot
> floppy to boot the system?
That's correct. I needed to use the 2.9 floppy.
> I got the exact same message by using a RELEASE boot floppy and trying
> to Install the snapshot. My *guess* is this is due to using the
> release install script on the snapshot, or perhaps not upgrading your
> /etc files properly as per the warnings from the developers (assuming
> you did an upgrade).
It was an install, not an upgrade, but I would expect that the packages
would just install w/o needing changes from an install script..
> The reason I guess you didn't use the 7/2 snapshot boot floppy is
> because I can't get the floppy29.fs to work on ANY machine I tested
> here (tested five) -- I get an error something like "UVM_Fault Fatal
> Fault in Supervisor Mode". Unfortunately, can't get any more accurate
> than that without difficulty, as the machine then clears the screen
> and reboots itself.
I hade the same problems. I will try booting from console to see if I can
log any better, but I think it still reboots w/o any debugging
information..
> (that's what I get for not following my own advice about "-current is
> for the highly experienced only" 8-)
I agree, but it should at least be able to boot if it's a snapshot. :)
- Brandon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. palmer, bpalmer@crimelabs.net pgp:crimelabs.net/bpalmer.pgp5