[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ipf

Sorry dude, but what you say sounds like one huge pissing match, if Theo wants
to play ball like that, his call. I think it is a mistake, sure the license
conflicts, and I am sure you and the lawyers and Theo and Darren and everyone
can argue licening till the freaking cows come home. My point is that removing
IPF is NOT helping OpenBSD, or the Open Source communities image. Big buissness
frowns on this kinda bickering, and seeing this I am sure a lot of large corps
will shy away from OpenBSD, even though it is the best and most secure OS. Oh
well, have fun, I will be running IPF on Solaris till things get resolved.


Tony Lambiris wrote:

> > I think Theo isn't being really cool about this one, I think the term
> "pissing
> > contest" describes the situation. Oh well, I am saddened to see Darren's
> Open your ears instead of your mouth. Do you seriously think Theo is going
> to go against OpenBSD's license and policy for a piece of software? NO. It's
> too simple: Darren's license conflicts with OpenBSD's... END OF STORY.
> > source removed from the OpenBSD tree. I can understand Darren's point of
> view,
> > a lot of people seem to be abusing his code and giving very LITTLE back.
> Oh
> > well the few spoil the cream for the many. Hopefully everyone will come to
> > their senses and Theo will put the source back, as IPF was a really big
> chunk
> > of OpenBSD's great security.
> The _only_ way it will see it's way back into OpenBSD's code is if Darren
> releases IPF under the BSD license (or something very similar which states
> you can modify IPF anyway you want).
> Big chunk of OpenBSD's security?? So what you are saying is now that IPF has
> been taken out of the core OS, all the team's auditing and fixing bugs
> doesn't equate to anything anymore? Are you mad? Does this mean that because
> they took out IPF, I can no longer encrypt my swap space, or use blowfish to
> hash my passwords? Pffff.