[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ipf

To: John Vernier Simon <john.simon@central.sun.com>
Subject: Re: ipf
From: William Yodlowsky <bsd@openbsd.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 16:37:37 -0400
Cc: tech@openbsd.org
Content-Disposition: inline
Mail-Followup-To: John Vernier Simon <john.simon@central.sun.com>,tech@openbsd.org
References: <38E757170F3F174CB31DF0D37B87B77E0156DC@EVS02.stpete.hsn.net> <003101c0e942$d8ec44d0$b503000a@STEALTH> <3B155594.3ACE1C1@central.sun.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i on OpenBSD/sparc 2.8-current

On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:18:28PM -0500, John Vernier Simon wrote:
[snip]
> well the few spoil the cream for the many. Hopefully everyone will come to
> their senses and Theo will put the source back, as IPF was a really big chunk
> of OpenBSD's great security.

Um, no, the security permeates the OS.  This was only an IP filter +
NAT.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ipf
  - From: John Vernier Simon <john.simon@central.sun.com>

References:
- RE: ipf
  - From: "Lipscomb, Al" <LipscombA@hsn.net>
- Re: ipf
  - From: "Tony Lambiris" <tlambiris@skillsoft.com>
- Re: ipf
  - From: John Vernier Simon <john.simon@central.sun.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ipf
Next by Date: Re: ipf
Prev by thread: Re: ipf
Next by thread: Re: ipf
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread