[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ipf
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 10:38:54PM -0400, Chris Hedemark wrote:
> Theo said:
>
> > Because Darren has *very clearly* said that the old versions are not
> > free either.
>
> But wait... you can't retroactively change the license on a piece of
> software that you have already distributed and the user has already
> accepted. If the OpenBSD team has been developing against software
> developed under one set of terms, can't development continue from that point
> ignoring the later versions coming from the official maintainer under new
> terms?
The crux of the mater is Darren claims his original license did not
grant anyone (OpenBSD included) the right to modify ipfilter.
Its not a retroactive change. No one was ever supposed to modify
ipfilter without permission, but for some reason that has not been clear
until now.
> Is this not similar to the genesis of OpenSSH?
Nope. ssh had a less restricted license on an old version. Ipfilter
never did but it seems no one realized that until recently.
please see: http://www.deadly.org/article.php3?sid=20010527142347
If you wade through the crap and the flames, there are a few intelligent
comments in there.
--
-Travis <kelp@nihilist.org>
- References:
- Re: ipf
- From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>
- Re: ipf
- From: "Chris Hedemark" <chris@yonderway.com>