[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JFS
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 09:47:35AM -0700, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 06:33 PM 2/3/2000 , Chuck Gagnon wrote:
>
> >I have not gotten a responce to my question about placing this code
> >under the IBM Public License or a more BSDish license yet. I'll let
> >you know what their reply is.
>
> They seem to be receptive to the idea, and may consider a Perl-like
> "dual licensing" scheme. (IBM has its own license, the IBM Public
> License, which is more like the BSD license than the GPL.)
They will not dual-license. The current code-drop is already linux
and GPL infected, and cannot be dual licensed. My conversations
with them indicated they were considering a second release of the
original codebase, without linuxisms, under a BSD friendly license.
> And IBM remembers -- or ought to -- where it got the TCP/IP stack
> for OS/2. Yes, it's from BSD.
People don't call them "Berkeley sockets" for nothin'.
--
David Terrell | "Please note that calling an attacker
dbt@meat.net | 'lame' is not an approved security method."
http://wwn.nebcorp.com/ | - Benjy Feen
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JFS
- From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
- Re: JFS
- From: Chuck Gagnon <gagnocg@ev1.net>
- References:
- JFS
- From: "Jack J. Woehr" <jwoehr@ibm.net>
- Re: JFS
- From: Chuck Gagnon <gagnocg@ev1.net>
- Re: JFS
- From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
- Re: JFS
- From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>