[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AltQ


>> I fitted AltQ 2.1-post-release in OpenBSD-current tonight. I didn't 
>> add any interface support beyond the one that is already into AltQ 
>> 2.1. Should we merge it to OpenBSD tree? Adding new drivers 
>> support should be kinda easy.
>Yes, that was my idea. (with the approval of the high players :-)
>We should also try to extend AltQ beyond the x86 platform. (in collaboration
>with the NetBSD team)
>Kenjiro, what would be the main difficulties in implementing AltQ on other
>CPUs ?
>Maybe you could submit the diffs (huge as they are, don't pollute the list,
>just send to whom are interested -> at least me ;-)

	just checking: the latest ALTQ is in KAME tree (www.kame.net/anoncvs
	available) so be sure to use that.  if you mean ALTQ in KAME tree
	by "2.1-post-release", that's just fine.
	IIRC there was one 64bit issue - int-to-pointer typecast somewhere
	in libaltq.

itojun