[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src [shlib.c change]



Whomever tested the reversion of ld/ld.so a couple of weeks ago
didn't do a very good job.  Given these libraries:

	/usr/lib/libc.so.23.2
	/usr/lib/libc.so.23.3
	/usr/lib/libc.so.24.0

When starting a program linked against /usr/lib/libc.so.23.2 at boot
time (in my specific case starting ntpd) the warning message:

	/usr/libexec/ld.so: warning: libc.so.24.0: minor version >= 2 \
	expected, using it anyway

is displayed.   This was fixed in the code that was backed out of
ld.so.  It may just be a bogus warning message.  It may also be that
the linker decided to use libc.so.24.0 which would be wrong.

// marc