[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: why multiple time_t definitions?

> Why is it that in time.h, utime.h, and sys/types.h we have definitions for
> time_t? Can't we just settle on one? My guess is that it's some sort of
> backwards compatibility issue wherein some people expect to find the definition
> in time.h or utime.h or sys/types.h. Wouldn't it be simpler to just include
> the one critical file in the other two?