Re: Ports tree version numbers UNLOCKED

[Marc Espie <Marc.Espie@liafa.jussieu.fr>]

On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 05:05:19PM +0100, Niklas Hallqvist wrote:
> Well as I don't run 2.6 anywhere on any build machine I don't do ports
> anymore.  I understand that it's a quality-ensuring decision, but it
> also is a quantity-diminishing decision, as I suspect it effectively
> cuts down the number of ports people to a third or less.

You still have 13 ports that list you as maintainer...
This is a problem, especially since most of these ports are highly
interesting and intricate things.

I don't know who would want maintainership of boehm-gc, libgcj, or
expect...


-- 
	Marc Espie		
|anime, sf, juggling, unicycle, acrobatics, comics...
|AmigaOS, OpenBSD, C++, perl, Icon, PostScript...
| `real programmers don't die, they just get out of beta'