Re: Ports tree version numbers UNLOCKED

[Christopher Turan <turans@umich.edu>]

Yes.  porters should be using 2.6 to do work on.

On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 10:17:59AM -0500, Son of Yaardvark wrote:
> On 5.December.1999 "Christopher Turan" chittered like a monkey:
> > Developers should be tracking 2.6.  Run 2.6 on your machines when
> > porting.
> 
> what does this mean?  Should ports maintainers only be using 2.6 to
> run/develop the ports or is -current okay?
> 
> -danimal
> "Remember folks. Street lights timed for 35 mph 
>  are also timed for 70 mph." - Jim Samuels