Re: mozilla/bloatzilla users please test

[Han Boetes <han@mijncomputer.nl>]

Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:59, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > > Uh why? Does this solve a problem? Or is it just funny.
> > >
> > > 1) It is better for users. Users do not want a browser which takes
> > >    45 seconds to start up, has more bugs, and is 3x slower than
> > >    the other one. They want something that they can use.
> >
> > Ok, so it's just funny.
> >
> > "bloatzilla" while accurate, doesn't fix the stated problem. It will
> > still be there.
>
> You ENTIRELY miss the point.
>
> People do not live in a vacuum.
>
> They think "hmm, I need a browser" Then they say "oh I heard about
> mozilla" then they install it
>
> You think they should install the CRAPPY BLOATED PIECE OF SHIT by
> default.
>
> We think otherwise.

Hilarious. You'll make the headlines once more.

May I suggest you don't put mozilla in the ports-tree at all and put
mozilla-firebird in the tree called mozilla-firebird. That way everyone
is happy.

I can already read the questions in misc@

  Q: Why isn't mozilla in the ports-tree
  A: Because it's deprecated.



# Han
-- 
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/quotingguide.html