Re: mozilla/bloatzilla users please test

[Marc Matteo <marcm@lectroid.net>]

On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:59, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:03, Peter Valchev wrote:
> > > with this diff, if you've been using mozilla, you're now using
> > > bloatzilla. and if you've been using mozilla-firebird, you're now using
> > > mozilla.
> > 
> > Uh why?  Does this solve a problem?  Or is it just funny.
> 
> 1) It is better for users.  Users do not want a browser which takes 45
>    seconds to start up, has more bugs, and is 3x slower than the other
>    one.  They want something that they can use.

Ok, so it's just funny.

"bloatzilla" while accurate, doesn't fix the stated problem.  It will
still be there.

What might be a better option is to have the mozilla port only build
development and/or library packages for other ports/packages that want
them (galeon comes to mind but there are others that aren't in-tree
yet).  This way there's NO {bloat|mo}zilla at all and the message is
sent loud and clear without the risk of confusing the heck out of people
("what's bloatzilla?") and possibly breaking other ports.

Marc