[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Opera 6.11 - freebsd emulation

To: OpenBSD-Ports Mailing List <ports@openbsd.org>
Subject: Re: Opera 6.11 - freebsd emulation
From: Jim Geovedi <negative@magnesium.net>
Date: 7 Feb 2003 03:52:29 -0800
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 03:52:28 -0800
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20030205153458.GA21600@ee.eee.metu.edu.tr> <b1usfe$303e$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <20030207080147.GB30990@ee.eee.metu.edu.tr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Feb 07, 2003 at 10:01:47AM +0200, canacar@eee.metu.edu.tr wrote:
> Well, Just after posting my earlier message Opera-freebsd crashed 
> (possibly due to murphy's laws) However, after testing for two more days,
> I still find opera 6.11 (freebsd) more stable than 6.03.
> I have not further tested the linux version though.

Did you get warning messages such as `Mutex unlock failure: Invalid
argument'?

So far, i have no problem with key-bindings which usually result a
coredump in opera-linux. It's Day.01.test, so i can't give my comment
about stability.

	jim geovedi <negative@magnesium.net>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Opera 6.11 - freebsd emulation
  - From: Pedro Marcolino <pedro@jazznet.pt>

References:
- Opera 6.11 - freebsd emulation
  - From: Can Erkin Acar <canacar@eee.metu.edu.tr>
- Re: Opera 6.11 - freebsd emulation
  - From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
- Re: Opera 6.11 - freebsd emulation
  - From: Can Erkin Acar <canacar@eee.metu.edu.tr>

Prev by Date: Re: konqueror 3.1 + ipv6
Next by Date: xcb update
Prev by thread: Re: Opera 6.11 - freebsd emulation
Next by thread: Re: Opera 6.11 - freebsd emulation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread