[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ntop

Hi,

> is anyone working on a ntop 2.1.x port?
> 
> I've compiled a working version of 2.1.3 on x86 without
> plugins. If nobody is working on a port, I will give it a try.
> (OpenBSD 3.2)

It's not worth the work. To many problems. 
Its very unstable. https with threading didn't work.
Stable tar.gz is without configure script (you have to use
autotools), I always thought a release is shipped with configure ...

And there are some other things (as gdchart and libpng is
shipped in the tgz)

I will switch to pfctl labels feature or an own small
app which fill up a sql-database with the information I need.
(pflogd seems to give all traffic information, someone need)


bye
   Waldemar

-- 
8485 D0CE 2743 656E 867C  5C93 0317 AFD8 BE21 BD90